Do
you flag the activities of others on Strava when they make no sense? Today when
I uploaded my run I found the two people immediately ahead of me to have run (and
Mo Farah is worried) speeds of approx 2 minutes per km. Speeds, that is, easily
achievable on a bike. These activities are clearly bogus and whoever uploaded
them should have realised this and removed the activity, changed the activity
type or flagged the activity themselves. What is surprising is how, even years
after Strava has been recording activities, there are still a myriad of
bullshit activities uploaded, apparently, without thought. Given how the people
responsible for these bullshit activities must be able to smell them, why is it
so many Strava users hesitate to flag these dodgy activities? Flagging is confidential
and all flags are investigated by Strava staff. If an activity is wrongly
flagged, it will be restored.
Strava
segments are created every day and cannot be individually policed by Strava
staff. Strava relies on users to flag dodgy activities. Not flagging is
actually a bad thing, as it means dodgy Strava activities are not being
policed. I understand the hesitation to flag. Where an activity is just silly,
I tend to comment on it and to ask the Strava user to take the necessary
action. But this means I identify myself. I’ve had a few people react badly to
my contacting them, but if they stop and think about it, it is the more decent
thing to do. Just flagging an activity can leave someone wondering why their
place on a Strava Leaderboard has disappeared. I know cyclists who have completed
segments in amazing times and who have noted how the activity was wind
assisted. Wind assistance is allowed under Strava, but other users have flagged
their activity nonetheless. They eventually get restored, but the decent thing to
do would have been to comment on the activity and to discuss how the time was achieved.
But why should other users have to policy dodgy users?
Perhaps
what we need is a Strava etiquette guide for all users. Those uploading
activities should have to click a button which asks “having reviewed the data
uploaded to Strava for your activity, do you agree that it accurately
represents your performance?” before the activity upload is completed. This way,
users are required to self-police rather than relying on others to police users
through flagging. Strava, like all walks of life, is potentially liable to
cheating. If all Strava users were required to stand over their activities as
accurate or be sanctioned, this would clean up Strava immediately. Crazy times
like 20 minutes for running 10km or cycling 60km in an hour, which often remove
other users’ KOMs, would quickly be sanctioned.
These
are just some thoughts and this article probably just suggests I have too much
time on my hands, but, for many people, Strava Leaderboards are very important and
positions, especially KOMs, are carefully protected. Those uploading activities
should take responsibility if they upload what are, in fact, fraudulent
activities. Strava is fun, but many athletes on Strava take their training and
racing serious; their data, their scores, their Leaderboard positions, should
be respected. If, for example, you forget to turn off the Garmin and drive a
segment thereby taking the KOM, you should delete the activity from Strava –
not wait for it to be flagged. You may find this funny, but in reality, for
some, it is about as funny as coming fourth in a race because someone on the
podium cheated.
No comments:
Post a Comment